Two Explanations of the Ruling Elite of our time, which is powered by an alliance of so-called Zionist Jews, better called Jewish Supremists, and Freemasons, which Fr. Fahey and others called "Judeo-Masonry." The first is from Fr. Denis Fahey, the second from Mr. Ivor Benson.

_________________________________________________

Father Denis Fahey (1883-1954)
a priest who resided in Ireland his entire life, explained some aspects of Judeo-Masonry this way:

There is unorganised opposition to the supernatural life of grace in each one of us, owing to the fall. This unorganised opposition of individuals leads to the formation of little anti-supernatural groups here and there, even without the concerted action of vast organised forces. The existence of united anti-supernatural action on the part of organised bodies is so far removed from the mind of the average Catholic that it needs to be stressed particularly and its aims made clear. The Christian framework of society is destined not only to aid us in attaining union with Christ but to serve as a bulwark against the assaults of the forces organised against our supernatural life. These forces are three in number, one being invisible, the other two visible. The invisible host is that of Satan and the other fallen angels, while the visible forces are those of the Jewish nation and Freemasonry. The Jewish nation is not only a visible organisation, but its naturalistic or anti-supernatural character is openly proclaimed by its refusal to accept the supernatural Messias and by its looking forward to a naturalistic messianic era. The Masonic society or group of societies is a visible organisation, but its naturalistic or anti-supernatural character is secret or camouflaged. The naturalism or anti-supernaturalism of its aims, as well as of its ritual and symbolism, is clearly grasped by only relatively few of the initiated. The pantheistic deification of man, which is the consequence of this naturalism, is the supreme secret of Freemasonry. Both of these visible societies, however, make use of subterfuge and secrecy in their modes of action against the supernatural life of the nations of the world. Accordingly, the most vitally real struggle in the world is that waged by those naturalistic or anti-supernatural armies, under the leadership of Satan, against those who accept the supernatural life of grace, participation of the life of the Blessed Trinity, under the leadership of our Lord Jesus Christ. (From Chapter 5, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation)

In his Encyclical letter on Freemasonry, Pope Leo XIII teaches authoritatively: “From what we have already set forth, it is indisputably evident that their [the Freemasons’] ultimate aim is to uproot completely the whole religious and political order of the world, which has been brought into existence by Christianity, and to replace it by another in harmony with their way of thinking. This will mean that the foundation and the laws of the new structure of society will be drawn from pure naturalism.” Now, it is historically certain that the Declaration of the Rights of Man had been conceived and elaborated in the Masonic lodges before it was presented to the States-General of France. Accordingly, the infamous Declaration, a naturalistic or anti-supernatural document, is in reality a declaration of war on membership of Christ and on the whole structure of society based on that supernatural dignity. The same naturalistic hostility to membership of Christ and the supernatural life of grace runs through all the documents concerning human rights drawn up under the influence of the organised forces that were responsible for the Declaration of 1789. That is the real struggle going on in the world, and in it every member of Christ is called upon to play his or her part. There can be no neutrality. “He that is not with me is against me ” (St. Matthew XII, 30.) -- (From Chapter 2, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation)

________________________________________________________

Here is another take on the Ruling Elite of the 20th century and today, this time from a non-Catholic, Mr. Ivor Benson. Mr. Benson does not mention freemasonry explicitly, but virtually every financier, politician, and prominent person who worked with the Jewish faction of the Ruling Elite in the 20th century -- were freemasons of one kind or another. (Naturally, the overwhelming vast majority of freemasons at the local level, as well as the vast majority of Jewish people, are not part of this sinister Ruling Elite. However, the mental outlook of the preponderance of influential Jewish leaders and influential Freemasons in the modern world has been malformed so as to sympathize with and work for the demise of Christian and western civilization in favor of a godless New World Order.. 

Keep in mind that the following was written circa 1980; it is from Mr.Ivor Benson's very important booklet, This Age of Conflict:

THE COMMUNIST - SUPERCAPITALIST -
ZIONIST NEXUS
 

The main mark of modern governments is that we do not know who governs, DE FACTO any more than DE JURE. We see the politician and not his backer; still less the backer of the backer; or, what is most important of all, the BANKER of the backer. Throned above all, in a manner without parallel in all the past, is the veiled prophet of finance, swaying all men living by a sort of magic.
-- G. K. Chesterton


The world is governed by very different persons to what is imagined by those who are not themselves behind the scene.
-- Benjamin Disraeli
 

Even the briefest survey of the forces which are shaping the history of the 20th century, creating social and political conditions correctly described by Spengler as "anarchy become a habit", would be incomplete without a closer look at the relationship of those supposed mighty opposites - capitalism and communism.

The key to the riddle is the word CAPITALISM. Most people, most of the time, make the mistake of supposing that the word capitalism means one thing; in fact, the word as commonly used has two sets of meaning, as different as chalk and cheese. If we are to understand why governments representing capitalist states adopt the most weirdly ambivalent attitudes towards communism, we must first learn to separate in our minds the two sets of meaning which that one word capitalism has been called on to represent.

Thus, two words are needed: CAPITALISM meaning what that word originally meant and what the dictionary says it means; and SUPERCAPITALISM, meaning the wholly changed form of what was once correctly called capitalism.

CAPITALISM as originally and correctly understood means private ownership of property and resources and competitive free enterprise in the supply of goods and services.

SUPERCAPITALISM, which can be defined as highly concentrated finance-capitalism, is not only different from capitalism, it is the antithesis of capitalism and sooner or later acquires the character of being actively ANTI-CAPITALIST.

For it is not possible to continue CONCENTRATING ownership and control of property and resources without at the same time REDUCING the number of those who own and control property and resources. Likewise, there can be no huge concentration of ownership and control without a corresponding inhibition or suppression of competitive free enterprise. What we have seen in the West is a progressive degeneration of capitalism into a form of supercapitalism, or anti-capitalism, which the less it resembles the original capitalism the more it resembles socialism, or communism.

Just enough genuine capitalism has remained in most of the countries of the West, and especially in the United States of America, to confuse the picture and make it harder for most people to see that capitalism has been largely replaced by what is essentially ANTI-CAPITALISM. In other words, the weak and struggling capitalism that survives serves as a camouflage for an all- powerful anti-capitalism which dominates both economics and politics.

Modern supercapitalist regimes like that of the United States, and communist regimes like that of the Soviet Union, have their differences and their oppositions of interest but these are unimportant when compared with what they have in common. Both are irreconcilably antagonistic towards nationalism.

Therefore, BOTH ARE ESSENTIALLY REVOLUTIONARY, having set themselves in fierce antagonism towards those political forms which are essentially evolutionary.

Since NATIONALISM is inseparably joined to a people's cultural heritage, it follows that all attacks on nationalism must include cultural sabotage and subversion - which is what we see today on both sides of the Iron and Bamboo Curtains, promoted with equal zeal by supercapitalists and communists.

There is only one genuine nationalism they support and that is Zionism, which is an internationally dispersed Jewish nationalism. Of course, they also support all sorts of spurious "nationalism" which they themselves set up and use, like "Black nationalism" in Africa, and even these are nearly always heavily laced with Marxism.

The reason why Western supercapitalism lives in constant dread of nationalism can be easily explained.

The fundamental issue in any state is whether or not there shall be an authority superior to economics. Which shall rule - politics or economics? And there can be no doubt that nationalism, in spite of all the ailments to which it is heir, energized by the instincts and will of the population, means that politics is the master and that economics, no matter how important it may be, has been relegated to its proper and natural subordinate status.

Since there is no way in which communism can be effectively resisted and defeated except by nationalism, it follows that supercapitalism is totally committed to co-existence with communism, and that supercapitalism can have no other long range aim except that of ultimate convergence with communism.

Likewise - and this is most important - there is only one political weapon that supercapitalism can use against nationalism, and that is a communist ideology that marshals the forces of the underworld and of rootless intellectualism, holding them ready to be aimed like a battering ram against any nationalist target.

An all-important factor with a binding and directing influence on all the other components of the 20th century world-revolution is that of Zionism, which can be described as a geographically dispersed but intensely united and passionately motivated Jewish nationalism. Paradoxically the Jewish people have come to the fore as a dominant influence in world affairs at a time when most Jews attach little or no importance to a religion which for close on two millennia was a powerful binding force.

Professor Hannah Arendt puts it like this:

"Twentieth century political developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm center of events".
The developments she describes correspond with the consolidation of Jewish power and influence on a global basis, a process that has continued at an accelerating pace since the turn of the century. . . .

(End of Excerpt)

____________________________________________________

Here is a partial bibliography for further reading on this subject of Judeo-Masonry:

Gary Allen,
NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY.

Ivor Benson,
THE OPINION MAKERS; TRUTH OUT OF AFRICA; THE ZIONIST FACTOR; THE BATTLE FOR SOUTH AFRICA; and the booklet: This Age of Conflict.

Arthur Butz,
THE HOAX OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY.

Whitaker Chambers,
WITNESS.

A.K. Chesterton,
THE NEW UNHAPPY LORDS.

Doug Christle,
THOUGHT CRIMES: THE KEEGSTRA CASE.

Curtis B. Dall,
FDR MY EXPLOITED FATHER-IN-LAW  (note: his Father-in-Law was FDR)

Donald Day,
ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS.

Fr. Denis Fahey
THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST IN THE MODERN WORLD; RULERS OF RUSSIA; THE KINGSHIP OF CHRIST AND THE CONVERSION OF THE JEWISH NATION; THE KINGSHIP OF CHRIST AND ORGANIZED NATURALISM; THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST AND THE REORGANIZATION OF THE SOCIETY.

Leon de Poncins,
JUDAISM AND THE VATICAN.

Leon de Poncins
FREEMASONRY AND THE VATICAN

The essays at www.October1958.com

C.H. Douglas,
THE MONOPLY OF CREDIT.

John T. Flynn,
WHILE YOU SLEPT.

David Gilmour,
DISPOSSESSED: THE ORDEAL OF THE PALESTINIANS 1917-1980.

Sir John Glubb (Glubb Pasha),
MIDDLE EAST CRISIS; PEACE IN THE HOLY LAND; THE LIFE AND TIMES OF MUHAMMAD.

Nahum Goldmann,
THE JEWISH PARADOX.

David Irving,
THE DESTRUCTION OF DRESDEN; UPRISING, HUNGARY 1956;

H.S. Kenan,
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.

Arthur Kitson,
THE BANKERS' CONSPIRACY.

Stephen Knight,
THE BROTHERHOOD. (This book is about Freemasony.)

Arthur Koestler,
THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE.

Bernard Lazare,
ANTISEMITISM.

Alfred M. Lilienthal,
THE ZIONIST CONNECTION.

George Orwell,
NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR.

Vance Packard,
THE HIDDEN PERSUADERS.

Thomas Pakenham,
THE BOER WAR.

James & Suzanne Pool,
WHO FINANCED HITLER?

Jim Condit Jr.
THE FINAL SOLUTION TO ADOLPH HITLER (DVD) at www.hitlerdvd.com
(This DVD shows the shocking connection between Zionism and Nazism, two sides of the same coin.)

Carroll Quigley,
TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME.

Douglas Reed,
FAR AND WIDE; SOMEWHERE SOUTH OF SUEZ; THE GRAND DESIGN OF THE 20TH CENTURY; THE CONTROVERSY OF ZION. (Reed was a London Times reporter at one time, and all his books are excellent as an honest reporter and analyst "on the scene", whether as physically on the scene, or a first hand witness of news events as they happened in his time (about 1914 to 1970).

Gideon Shimoni,
JEWS AND ZIONISM: THE SOUTH AFRICAN EXPERIENCE 1910-1967.

Cleon Skousen,
THE NAKED CAPITALIST.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn,
THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO; LENIN IN ZURICH; THE OAK AND THE CALF; SPEECHES.

Oswald Spengler,
THE DECLINE OF THE WEST.

Judge Wilhelm Staglich,
THE AUSCHWITZ MYTH.

Margaret Stucki,
THE REVOLUTIONARY MISSION OF MODERN ART

Antony C. Sutton,
WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION; WALL STREET AND FDR.

Nikolai Tolstoy,
VICTIMS OF YALTA; THE MINISTER AND THE MASSACRES.

F.J.P. Veale,
CRIMES DISCREETLY.

Thomas Walsh,
ISABELLA THE CRUSADER.

Charles Weber,
THE HOLOCAUST: 120 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.

Nesta Webster,
THE SOCIALIST NETWORK; WORLD REVOLUTION.